![]() |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| | Historial Review | Mission | Vision | Values | Objetives | Integral Science: Research Methodology | |||||||||||||||
Integral Science: Research MethodologyThe Cognoscible Technologiesī methodology of work is very specific and different from that used by traditional science. It derives from the union of multiple disciplines in the cognitive sciences and from methodologies that allow to use both brain hemispheres, optimizing therefore the way to make science. ) integral science Thus, by fusing Neurosciences, Epistemology, Developmental Behavior Modelling (DBM), Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) and Tibetan Buddhist Meditation, we were able to create a method that allows us to know in advance what we are going to obtain, how long / much time it will take (us) and what resources we will need; we can also find alternative results - if there are still better ones left to be discovered) -, and all this, even before beginning the investigation. Our methodology is also characterized to produce and to allow the following benefits:
Thanks to this, we know the state-of-the-art in nanotechnology. This knowledge shows how all the known physical and chemical laws are replaced by the size factor and how the equations must be rewritten to describe correctly the factors involved in nanoscale. Also, this method allows us to start the development of the next generation: picotechnology: 1000 times smaller than nanotech. Difference between a Traditional Scientific research and a Development by Cognoscible Technologies
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
Argentina · Chile · Spain · Switzerland · Venezuela |
|||||||||||||||